WebMay 2, 2024 · The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday that the city of Boston violated the Constitution when it rejected an application to fly a Christian flag on one of the three flagpoles in front of city hall. Because the city program that allowed other private groups to raise and fly their own flags was not speech by the city, the court held, the city … WebIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HAROLD SHURTLEFF, ET AL., ) Petitioners, ) v. ) No. 20-1800 CITY OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, ) ET AL ... Shurtleff versus Boston, Massachusetts. Mr. Staver. ORAL ARGUMENT OF MATHEW STAVER. ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS . MR. STAVER: Mr. Chief Justice, and
Shurtleff v. City of Boston - Becket
WebJan 17, 2024 · When it hears oral argument on Tuesday in Shurtleff v.City of Boston, the Supreme Court will return to the role of religion in public spaces.The question comes to the court in an important free speech case arising from Boston’s practice of allowing outside groups to fly their flags on one of the three flagpoles in front of city hall. WebJan 18, 2024 · Supreme Court Bar. ORAL ARGUMENTS. Argument Transcripts; Argument Audio; Calendars and Lists; Courtroom Seating; CASE DOCUMENTS. Docket Search; … sohead
Boston violated First Amendment when it rejected Christian flag, …
WebMay 3, 2024 · In Shurtleff v. Boston, the ruling which came down on May 2, 2024, the court unanimously held that the City of Boston violated the First Amendment’s free speech … WebPetitioner Shurtleff argues that the City of Boston designated the City Hall flagpole as a public forum for private speech. Quoting Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Education … WebShurtleff v. City of Boston, 596 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.The case concerned the … soh dept of taxation